Case incident 2 the dangers of groupthink

Engineers of the space shuttle knew about some faulty parts months before takeoff, but they did not want negative press so they pushed ahead with the launch anyway. Or led a team in which the team members were reluctant to express their own opinions?

The negative impact of groupthink took place during the s as both companies released globalization expansion strategies.

There was a recognized downside to group problem solving in that it takes groups more time to come to a decision and requires that people make compromises with each other. One of the downsides of social media is that it can accelerate getting locked into a point of view.

If necessary, goes back and re-examines initial alternatives that were rejected.

The dangers of groupthink

Yet, I was struck by the fact that these highly experienced skiers eagerly joined in for some out-of-bounds skiing during extreme avalanche-prone conditions. As the group becomes more uniform in their views, they begin to see outsiders as possessing a different and inferior set of morals and characteristics from themselves.

Sociocognitive theory[ edit ] According to a new theory many of the basic characteristics of groupthink — e. A study by Leana indicates the interaction between level of group cohesion and leadership style is completely insignificant in predicting groupthink.

All effective alternatives should be examined. By the start of the 20th century the phrase was used to mock the person who followed the herd without engaging their brain. Then again, maybe it was just greed.

We, human beings, are social creatures. They all knew better. Up until the consequence of groupthink erupted they were considered blue chips and darlings of the London Stock Exchange.

By following these guidelines, groupthink can be avoided. Case studies[ edit ] Politics and military[ edit ] Groupthink can have a strong hold on political decisions and military operations, which may result in enormous wastage of human and material resources.

The situational conditions included group cohesion. The decision was a failed attempt to gain a stronger negotiating stance against Major League Baseball. Gathers relevant information from outside sources. Manz and Sims conducted a study showing that autonomous work groups are susceptible to groupthink symptoms in the same manner as decisions making groups within businesses.

He devised ways of preventing groupthink: Leaders should not express an opinion when assigning a task to a group. William Fulbrightattempted to present their objections to the plan, the Kennedy team as a whole ignored these objections and kept believing in the morality of their plan.

The Dangers of Groupthink

This is counter intuitive, because you might expect that social media would make it easier to get multiple points of view. Empirical support for it has also not been consistent.


Some studies indicate group cohesion and leadership style to be powerfully predictive of groupthink, while other studies indicate the insignificance of these factors. Members censor their opinions in order to conform. Two well-known examples of Groupthink in action are the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster and the Bay of Pigs invasion.

These factors range from causal to effectual and focus on group and situational aspects. After a few successes, the group begins to feel like any decision they make is the right one because there is no disagreement from any source. The organization should set up several independent groups, working on the same problem.

What an example of groupthink! All three terms are fostering happy talk on the web and in social networks, with relatively rare negative commentary. Sadly, three of them died in the inevitable avalanche. This is when team members convince themselves that despite evidence to the contrary, the decision or alternative being presented is the best one.

A number of factors such as shared illusions and rationalizations contributed to the lack of precaution taken by Naval officers based in Hawaii. Most modern-PCs are as capable as an Apple computer of conducting design related work.So, to me, groupthink is a counter-productive [collective] state of mind, rather than a process – and therefore the converse of “the wisdom of crowds,” which I take to represent the proper distillation of solutions and strategies from the freely stated opinions and considerations of a group.

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.

Political case studies of groupthink serve to illustrate the impact that the occurrence of groupthink can have in today's political scene. The Dangers Of Group Think Case Incident PROJECTS FLAB09 Week 5 Case Study Avoiding Group Think Ross Buscemi 2/9/ The case study called for us to determine how a Team and Project Manager can to avoid the threat of Groupthink.

Free Essays on Solution Case Incident 2 The Dangers Of Groupthink for students.

Avoiding Groupthink

Use our papers to help you with yours 1 - Aug 30,  · The dangers of groupthink. Strict conformity of opinion is the enemy of intellectual liberty — and both conservatives and liberals fall into this trap.

For one-semester, undergraduate level courses in Organizational Behavior. Robbins & Judge, unlike any other author team, provide the research you want in the language your students understand.

Case Incident 2: Long Hours, Hundreds of E-mails, and No Sleep: Does This Sound Like a Satisfying Job?

Case Incident 2: The Dangers of .

Case incident 2 the dangers of groupthink
Rated 3/5 based on 90 review