Only first-person will let you lie to the reader with impunity and then make them jump with surprise at "The protagonist is schizophrenic! How do the other characters see things? There may be things the main character does not know.
Because present-tense narrators do not know what is going to happen, they are unable to create the kind of suspense that arises from knowledge of upcoming events. There are hundreds of other reasons to use the first person perspective! I doubt the majority of readers are at all bothered by that format.
Narrator is generally reliable. One great advantage of first person narration is that a narrator can say whatever he wants, which is impossible with third-person narration, and he can be completely excused for this because it can be part of his character.
Present tense restricts our ability to manipulate time. He can also hide expositions within a stream of consciousness and turn them into musings and thoughts. As you can see, this style comes with certain strengths, such as simplicity, accessibility and directness.
He can also put across the motivations of the main character, and his reactions to situations will be effectively imparted, creating a strong sense of empathy in the readers.
It narrows the experience.
Much like first-person, you can also put across the motivations of your main character, although this is a little trickier in second-person without coming across as instructional or clunky. There is no opportunity for an unreliable narrator in second-person unless you combine it with first, giving you two main characters.
It would be difficult for an author who uses first person to move through a number of sub-plots and various narrative threads.
Subplots give scope to a book and provide more layers for a writer to tell her story. Limited Perspective One of the disadvantages of first-person POV is the fact that readers are confined to one perspective for the entire story.
Narrator is reliable this could also be seen as a pro. Direct Access and Urgency One of the primary advantages of the first person POV is that a reader is given direct access into the mind of the main protagonist. The present tense can diminish suspense. Your hand gripped it as if it belonged in your palm; your finger wrapped around the trigger as you aimed.
This is especially effective in mystery stories and thrillers, in which the unraveling of conspiracies is a key element of the plot. Story is limited to what the main character knows or perceives.
Leave the protagonist nameless, faceless, maybe even in extreme cases genderless - and let the reader fill in the blanks with their own face and name. Take a common trope: Of course, there is also First-person narration is ideal for a short story, and can work really well in the hands of a skilled novelist for example, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, The Catcher in the Rye, by J.
On the other hand, a passive narrator that simply observes is a trap that many writers fall into. The choice for a first person point of view immediately tells the reader whose story this is. For more great writing advice, click here. The Advantages Second-person puts the reader into the story, and if done right can submerge the reader into the narrative completely.
Also, hiding things behind scenes is easier. New fiction writers sometimes opt to write their novel in first-person, as they think this will be easier. The first-person POV technique also helps create urgency in a story because readers only know as much as the POV character does, so each discovery or revelation is a surprise.
The main character can misinterpret events, lie, mislead, or spin the reader. The principle of selection can be applied more readily, and ruthlessly, in past tense.
Limited to only what the main character perceives.
This builds a level of interaction that can strengthen a bond with a story. You can also put across the motivations of your main character, which to an outsider may not seem relatable, yet as you are inside their brain the logic behind their actions makes more sense.
The use of present tense encourages us to include trivial events that serve no plot function simply because such events would actually happen in the naturalistic sequence of time.
What they feel, your reader feels. List of Disadvantages of First Person Narration 1. Subscribe to our FREE email newsletter and download free character development worksheets!First person point of view is the default choice for many novel writing beginners.
Not only is it thought to be the easier viewpoint to handle, it is believed to be somehow warmer and more intimate, too, because you can get as up close and personal to the main character as it’s possible to get.
The first-person point of view gives readers a direct line to a main character. The readers feel a personal connection to the narrator, but hearing a story from only one person has limitations and drawbacks.
Before deciding the point of view for a narrative, explore both the advantages and disadvantages of a particular style. Jul 26, · Best Answer: Writing in first person has both its benefits and disadvantages. On the plus side, writing in first person gives the personal and unique perspective of one specific character.
This can make it easier for the reader to relate to the main character which is one of the keys to a good book. On the Status: Resolved.
Jun 23, · Some of the advantages to writing your novel in first-person are: It mirrors real life – we experience life around us only from our own point of view – we don’t know what other people are billsimas.com: The Thrill Begins.
Using first-person: advantages and disadvantages. The use of the first-person narration in an essay means that the author is writing exclusively from his or her point of view -. Third Person, Limited narration.
This offers a compromise between the other two. It is in third person, like omniscient, but is limited to one character's point of view. The reader only knows what the main character thinks, feels, and perceives. Advantages: 1. More intimate than omniscient, though less than first person. 2.Download