Technology today and yesterday essay

Doug Casey on the Nanny State

When television host Charlie Rose fell from grace following multiple accusations of what just about any woman would call predatory conduct, he said in a statement that "I always felt that I was pursuing shared feelings. The monks of the Dark Ages toiled to preserve truths for the sake of truth, keeping faith that the time might come when the record would be better understood.

Once more, people have been deprived of a familial, non-sexual knowledge of the opposite sex, and another healthy bond between the sexes has been frayed. It has also been analyzed in magazines and journals stretching back to the s; in the books of writers like Midge Decter, George Gilder, and other intellectual pioneers; and in the ongoing research of contemporary sociologists like W.

During those same 50 years, widespread defection from that teaching has scattered the flock like no other single force of division. The gin alleys of London gave rise to Victorian moral renewal.

Twenty years ago, evidence from all over the social sciences already indicated that the sexual revolution was leaving a legacy of destruction. That includes not only dating apps like Tinder, but also the consumption of pornography, which spreads false accounts of relations between the sexes that are poisoning romance on a macrocosmic scale.

But today, the old ways of knowing all these desiderata — that is, by reference to the family and extended family — no longer exist for many Technology today and yesterday essay, and are growing weaker for many more. Because our organic connections to one another have been sundered as never before, outside wartime or natural catastrophe.

Unless and until there is a familial and religious revival, arguments on behalf of limited government are futile.

For understandable reasons, much of the focus has been on individual tales.

Only in a world where sex is allegedly free of consequences would any man dare to proposition women on the spot, over and over, as appears to have been the case among the repeat offenders accused in the harassment revelations of the past two years.

Absent meaningful backlash against the revolution via some form of moral or religious renaissance, the state will continue to play the role of super-daddy. Identity politics is behind many of the most incendiary clashes of our time.

Twenty years later, it is past time to ask: Put differently, Weinstein, Matt Lauer, Garrison Keillor, and the rest may yet succeed in doing what generations of clergy have not: But a great many men taking for granted the sexual availability of any given woman, in one arena after another — that is new.

Because overall, the state is the financial backer that makes single motherhood — and absent fatherhood — possible. The research was overwhelming, all of it proving the point that a stable family has come to trump material assets as the main currency of these two new nations.

These were the separate, non-intersecting worlds of rich and poor. No rollback of the sexual revolution, no rollback of the federal government. And since the revolution, a great many people can no longer figure out how to supply them. Yet these are not the only demonstrations that religious traditionalism may have gotten something right that most of the rest of the world keeps getting wrong.

The fracturing of the family has rendered the modern state a flush but controlling super-daddy. Whatever else it has wrought, the revolution has divided and scattered ineradicably familial beings — human beings — like no other force in our time.

The recent sexual-harassment scandals, by their very inescapability, have made it harder for many people to continue denying the pernicious effects of the revolution itself.

Though some of the riptides of are obviously political — like arguments over immigration, tax reform, and the Supreme Court — others, like those already discussed, spring from a more primordial place.

Post-revolution, romance for many seems the opposite of what Hart so famously rendered. Several years ago, I worked similar ground in my own book, Adam and Eve after the Pillstudying many examples of the paradoxical and mostly unseen fallout of the revolution.

Most visibly in the United States, millions are looking to government and to their political-cultural tribes to replace what they have lost — connections to family and transcendent communities. No Pill, no sexual-harassment scandals on the scale seen today.

Wilson pointed above all to the library that social science had been building for decades, filled with books and studies about the correlations between family particulars and behavioral probabilities. Reading some of the grislier details of the ongoing scandals, many have been asking themselves: There is something unnatural and inhuman about the way many human beings now pass their days.

For the past 50 years, religious traditionalists, especially though not exclusively faithful Catholics, have been variously disparaged, vilified, and mocked, mainly on account of one historical artifact: Has it helped to make two nations into one again?

Meanwhile, secular people, for their part, find contraception to be not only permissible, but more and more a technology that they cannot live without — to many, it is now a human "right.

Mary Eberstadt Summer Almost two decades before J.

Two Nations, Revisited

In effect, the state has become the angel investor of family dysfunction. But the empirical record remains even clearer now than it was 20 years ago — and it will still be clear 20, or for that matteryears from now, whether generations mired in denial acknowledge as much or not.

Children in one-parent families, compared to those in two-parent ones, are twice as likely to drop out of school. Girls in one-parent families are twice as likely as those in two-parent ones to have an out-of-wedlock birth.

There are also what might be called "macroscopic" proofs — new evidence that the revolution not only continues to disfigure individual lives, but is also widening its effects into society and politics in ways that now amount to signature problems of our times.Mary Eberstadt is a Senior Research Fellow at the Faith and Reason Institute in Washington, D.C., and author most recently of It’s Dangerous to essay is adapted from a speech given in Washington, D.C., to Legatus, a Catholic business association, on November 29, Identifying emerging economic trends — and exploiting the investment opportunities associated with them — is the underlying principle of The Casey’s a powerful technique that’s been tremendously profitable for Casey Research subscribers for nearly three decades - and can be for you too.

Technology today and yesterday essay
Rated 4/5 based on 40 review