When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. I sure as heck wouldn"t want to live in a society where the only people who have guns are the police, military, and criminals.
Gun control only means that the guns will be taken out of the hands of million law-abiding American, most of whom use them for protection, most of whom have never even shot a live target, never mind a human, and they go right into the hands of the criminals.
When there is absolutely no reason to impose stricter gun control, why should our government lower our liberty and safety? Yes, it is common sense that the more powerful weapon you have, the easier it is for someone to commit a crime. This article was originally published by " FSP " - The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
What tests are you talking about? The only people that could have guns were the German military, the military that ended up being the law and order of all of the Nazi-occupied countries. During that same time period, the murder rate fell from 9.
Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined. Therefore, any governmental restrictions on guns imposed on American citizens is unconstitutional and would literary mean an attack on the Constitution. They were exceptionally wise men who studied the history, governments, cultures, and societies that went before them and wanted nothing but the good and prosperity of the people and their republic; that is exactly why they were ready to sacrifice their lives in defense of liberty and freedom from the British Colonialism.
They flood the military and police with assault weapons and armaments galore. Another great example is the gun control laws introduced in Australia, which caused a massive spike in nearly every crime rate category.
Things such as much more extensive background checks there are obviously levelsa longer waiting period, a more extensive test, a limit on what kind of guns can be bought, etc.
Are they not ourselves? Naming those affected by gun violence, he asserted to a cheering, standing crowd: What makes a society safe is the very freedom given to each and every individual to bear arms.
Moreover, we know that the arms industry will find ways to sabotage gun control measures, as they did with bump stocks that make semi-automatic firearms shoot faster. The Second Amendment of the Constitution clearly states: It is astonishing how the corporate media quickly points figures at the guns but not the crazed individuals who has been having his brained chewed by these dangerous drugs, which most TV stations proudly sponsor.
That is not true; when we are talking about gun freedom and less crime, not everyone must have a firearm in order to lower the crime rate. This caused tension between the states. Guns are also Inanimate Objects It is yet another evidence against any gun control laws that bats, knives and other inanimate objects are the cause for the loss of many more lives than the use of guns.
New Yorkfor instance, placed high duties on items that consumers elsewhere ultimately would be forced to pay. Thank you, and vote for Con. The current protocol is not working. While criminals will never turn their guns in, it is always the regular citizenry who will be left defenseless.
Youth involved in this movement are insisting on their right to be free of violence in school. America is built on the mission that the government is for the People.
And leaders of both major political parties expressed sympathy for victims and their families, while avoiding comment on gun control. Also, do you mean test by ability? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? She says police officers, firemen and others who disagree are secretly weak and need a gun to feel powerful.
Men and women, rich and poor, black and white, lawyer and street sweeper all own firearms. This is in spite of the fact that violent crime rate in the US is on a sharp decline according to the FBI"s very own study. Stricter gun control laws do not reduce crime.
He can entrust other authorities with this power. And then there are those who argue that people who want to harm others will always be able to get their hands on guns, either legally, or illegally.Gun Control: The Battle Rages On Abstract This paper discusses and is centered around the on-going debate over gun control, I directly address how each major political party views this subject and what I believe the United States Government should do to be able to best combat this tremendous issue.
At the same time the politicians fruitlessly debate whether or not to impose stronger gun controls on the civilian population, they militarize society to the nth degree. They flood the military and police with assault weapons and armaments galore. Mar 02, · States’ Rights vs. Gun Rights.
By The Editors March 2 City of Chicago, is whether the Second Amendment protects the individual right to keep and bear arms against state and city gun laws. make it far more difficult for states and cities to impose gun-control measures (even measures less stringent that an outright ban)?.
The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new.
InPresidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
Feb 23, · The recent school shooting in Parkland, Florida, has again created a debate over whether or not the country needs additional gun control laws.
Rather than wading into that debate, perhaps we should explore why so. Feb 13, · Debate on gun control should ask whether Congress has power to regulate and has little to do with today's debate over gun control. not gun control, is the answer to mass shootings.Download