In this papers, the historiographers are coming in contact with written bias and undependable beginnings and the best grounds that they can trust upon is the histories from the African Americans.
The slaves and white people both believed in Christianity and that should hold been a tie that would convey them closer together. When reading some of the accounts from northern white sources and the way they observed the slaves celebrate Christianity, it makes me think of ignorance.
Davidson and Lytle use a great depth of research, not limited to one kind of source. It was imperative for the authors to examine the validity of this source before using it. Despite the minor questions left unanswered and subtle prejudices, the authors did an excellent job of proving their thesis.
This seems to be correct if we examine the backgrounds of historians, especially those further into the past. The authors do question whether her mental status was viable or not. By not depending heavily on any one type of source, Davidson and Lytle were able to cover multiple opinions.
Then, they pondered over the different ways that the source could be biased.
This is because Germany served as a bigger threat than Japan to the Allied Powers. They are almost confessing to be biased from the start. It disturbs me that people cr iticize one another for the manner they celebrate a religion that is of the same sort.
After reading this papers, it made me believe about different civilizations and about how I, myself, have criticized and given false certification of people from different civilizations and backgrounds.
With the evidence presented, readers are left to decide for themselves the feelings that the slaves possessed. Unfortunately, ignorance is a job that struck and is here to remain. Even though the narrative may change from interviewer to interviewer, at least we are acquiring true statement from a existent slave who endured bondage, and non from person who did non.
They also prove that in direct testimonial from an ex-slave to a white person, the story might be limited or exaggerated depending on the circumstances of the interview. History IISeptember 11, The Lewinsky Scandal… A perfect example as to why we cannot accept everything at face value before carefully examining it first.
Because they were covering a topic and not an event, microcosm was the most appropriate method of examining the subject. This can be the same for history. It is not know if the ex-slave was capable of recalling accurate details of her life.
With opinions, come mental baggage and therefore prejudices. I believe that non all of the southern and northern histories of bondage during the civil war were meant as racialist remarks, but merely as ignorance.
As earlier mentioned, the authors used two interviews of the same ex-slave by different reporters. We must carefully consider different aspects of articles so that we do no make the mistake of believing everything we read.
Log in or register now. The authors explain why it is hard to except the testimony of any contemporary of freedmen, even freedmen themselves.
The suitable use of microcosm provides a very effective job of examining these facts needed to prove the thesis. Blacks were treated differently depending on location, workplace, and status. In about every manner, it is impossible to find what the slaves truly thought and felt about bondage and their Masterss because of the deficiency of proper grounds.
They questioned the validity of many sources that, if accurate, would have contained the perspective of an ex-slave.In “The View from the Bottom Rail”, the authors James Davidson and Mark Lytle stated several facts why it is difficult for historians to recover the freedman’s point of view in regards to slavery.
They questioned the validity of many sources that, if accurate, would have contained the perspective of an ex-slave. “The View from the Bottom Rail”, an article in After the Fact, provides an opportunity to examine different aspects of analysis.
If we look at it carefully, then we will be able to determine if the thesis was proven effectively. January 29, HIS Dr.
Harris A View From the Bottom Rail The View From the Bottom Rail is a document dealing with the ways in which historians have tried to recover the newly freed slaves’ feelings and point of view after the Civil W. The View from the Bottom Rail Essay by m lipscomb, University, Bachelor's, A+, August download word file, 3 pages download word file, 3 pages 6 votes/5(6).
After the Fact: Bottom Rail on Top Words | 7 Pages.
AAfter The Fact: The View From the Bottom Rail Chris Bean Bl: A 5/29/12 Mr. Penza Summary of Chapter: With the sound of cannons and gunshots firing in the air, slaves in the south knew that freedom was coming to a nation of four million slaves.
Free term papers & essays - The View from the Bottom Rail, M.Download